Roy Stuart wrote:It's hydrodynamics 101 Kayu.
High lift noses are what get boards up and planing early. Bottom roll is a low lift displacement feature, yes I know the difference.
It's amazing how many people buy into these myths.
.
kayu wrote:
BTW Roy, high lift noses for lift ?.....now thats mythical !
kayu wrote:It would get on the plane easier with a smidgen of roll up front
Roy Stuart wrote:Kayu you are wrong, bottom roll reduces lift and delays planing.
Of course the board with bottom roll in the nose can work well, but the roll will delay planing nonetheless.
I pay particular attention to acceleration on takeoff and use high nose lift as an important part of the strategy. ... you are as usual trying to cover up your faux pas by getting personal and making irrelevant comments . If anyone has been googling it's you, I've known the facts for many years. . glad that you are getting educated boy.
.
Roy Stuart wrote:How does a board "look like a board people might surf" ??
Please explain
You should direct that "gem" of wisdom at the many thousands of people around the world that ride McCoys.....Roy Stuart wrote:Kayu you are wrong, bottom roll reduces lift and delays planing.
.
seasofcheese wrote:
Roll isn't the point here
.
kayu wrote:Roy Stuart wrote:Kayu you are wrong, bottom roll reduces lift and delays planing.
Of course the board with bottom roll in the nose can work well, but the roll will delay planing nonetheless.
I pay particular attention to acceleration on takeoff and use high nose lift as an important part of the strategy. ... you are as usual trying to cover up your faux pas by getting personal and making irrelevant comments . If anyone has been googling it's you, I've known the facts for many years. . glad that you are getting educated boy.
.
.are you saying '' nose designed to produce more lift"
seasofcheese wrote:
its about you cutting an outline in the Joe Baugues mini Simmons shadow without taking into account Joe's cleaver design facets - he after all made the foot prints that you've followed with your furniture. You've taken an outline and now knocking anyone who compliments it.
.


kayu wrote:You should direct that "gem" of wisdom at the many thousands of people around the world that ride McCoys.....Roy Stuart wrote:
Kayu you are wrong, bottom roll reduces lift and delays planing.
.
bunker wrote:Original Spoon in 2003 = Contradiction in terms...
Bandwagon jumper
Roy Stuart wrote:I came up with the outline myself and had never heard of a simmons, and yes I rode the boards extensively 2003/004.
Roy Stuart wrote:
surfinsmiler wrote:
I can follow the arguments but it does'nt matter.That Spoon shaped piece of art with the red/white inset deck that Roy has made deserves museum space.It's beautiful and I don't care how it rides.I'd happily put it in a room next to a few Ducatis and other style icons and just dream over the colours and the curves.
Cuttlefish wrote:
Well it's a wooden copy of a spoon not a mini-Simmons.
Two different designs and egos aside I doubt most of us (including Roy) hadn't heard of Bob Simmons boards or Lindsay Lord's tome until coming across it on Swaylocks through the internet.
mal-nourished wrote:
spoons like these were evident all over the world 30yrs prior to roys unoriginal idea
and yes they where exactly the same
.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest