MulletMug wrote:Congratulations Roy Stewart! You are infact the most annoying member MSW has ever seen. After a few weeks of looking on here for good info, i've discovered all that you have accomplished on these boards. Congratulations, you are the winner, your check and trophy will arrive in 3-5 busineess days. You should think about entering the World Competion, although Carrot Top, and Mike "The Situation", will be tough competitors, but i think you have what it takes.
ATTMFKH wrote:I think the man is a fine craftsman and an entertainer , the Forum would be a much duller place without him
skimmer2 wrote:ATTMFKH wrote:I think the man is a fine craftsman and an entertainer , the Forum would be a much duller place without him
Fine craftsman...absolutely....stunning boards
Entertainer.....hmmmm...at times
Duller forum.....agreed
What you forgot:
Annoying/hijacking/self promoter/objectional/single-minded/always right...etc
It's the hi-jacking of threads for the sake of it that bugs me most....spoils some very good threads.....but what I am always amazed at is that intelligent people on this forum rise to the bait every time....and so it continues.
I'd like to see more pics of the sword in action![]()
![]()
![]()
Ninja Roy at his finest.
mal-nourished wrote:unfortunately it is the baggage roy carries with him its not going to be swept under the carpet ..

roberdy wrote:I am staying on the fence, the entire forum vs Roy thing is tedious in the extreme and detracts from what is often pretty solid and reasoned debate, as soon as the comments about mafia, Gmac, Randy Rarick and the Olo tour start up it is usually the death knell for any thread.
mal-nourished wrote:can we not just find away to put roy in his own little compartment somewhere where if he does comment on threads its shown that he has commented and if one chooses to do so they can log into his special place rather than have his ramblings cluttering up every decent thread that appears he is dragging the forum down...everyones a winner and he has no recourse about censorship...
Roy Stuart wrote:roberdy wrote:I am staying on the fence, the entire forum vs Roy thing is tedious in the extreme and detracts from what is often pretty solid and reasoned debate, as soon as the comments about mafia, Gmac, Randy Rarick and the Olo tour start up it is usually the death knell for any thread.
Gmac randy etc is almost always brought up by malnourished and Chai Wallah not myself.
Reasoned debate is what I do!
There is an ignore feature, anyone who responds does so by exercising their free will.
.
roberdy wrote:
the entire forum vs Roy thing is tedious in the extreme
Roy Stuart wrote:roberdy wrote:
the entire forum vs Roy thing is tedious in the extreme
It hasn't happened, it's just Roy vs a handful of the usual suspects out of a huge list of members.
Just a reminder to stick to the facts.
.
Roy Stuart wrote:There's no monopolising, the bottom line is that when I express my opinion it would go no further than one post if people didn't find it interesting enough to respond to. You respond with dozens of posts and are one of the main responders to start the personal attack syndrome and yet you have the hypocricy to accuse me of thread hijacking.
Basically you feel that you must respond as you can't let the dissenting opinion go unchallenged... that's your choice so suffer the consequences, the consequences being a protracted argument.
If you didn't want the argument you wouldn't engage in it so stop pretending that you are a victim and use the ignore button if you wish to avoid conversation with me.
.


waxer00 wrote:yes i agree ,the irony here is simply the best.a long protracted argument about not having long protracted arguments

waxer00 wrote:just googled pleonasmthanks for that .i`ll be using it soon in a posting near you .thanks for the `free gift`!
ATTMFKH wrote:always a pleasure , never a chore![]()
Philshoz wrote:ATTMFKH wrote:always a pleasure , never a chore![]()
Is that what you tell the missus?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests